article · Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Limited access to safe drinking water is a critical global issue, particularly in areas with inadequate infrastructure. Solar stills offer a promising alternative for such regions. This study investigates the influence of square baffles within a modified solar still design on its overall efficiency. Additionally, the integration of reflectors is explored to enhance both evaporation and condensation rates. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a paraffin wax phase change material (PCM) combined with silver nanoparticles is assessed within the modified still. Thermo-economic analyses are conducted to evaluate the economic feasibility of the proposed system. The findings demonstrate a significant improvement in distillation yield. The modified still with square baffles achieved a yield of 9800 mL/m 2 .day compared to 3550 mL/m 2 .day for the reference still, representing a 193 % increase. Moreover, incorporating the nano-PCM at an optimal configuration (25 cords) resulted in a further 265 % productivity increase for the modified still with both square baffles and reflectors. This configuration also achieved an efficiency of 63 %. Economic analysis revealed a minimal cost difference between the reference still (0.014 $/L) and the modified still with square baffles and nano-PCM (0.01 $/L). In terms of environmental impact, the modified still exhibited a lower annual CO 2 emission of 28.8 tons. • Using square baffles in the basin of cords pyramid solar still is tested. • Using external reflectors and PCM-Ag with cords pyramid SS is investigated. • With square baffles reflectors and PCM-Ag, the productivity increase of CPSS was 265 %. • For PSS and CPSS-SB -Ag, the reported expenses of the treated water were 0.0141 and 0.01 $/L, correspondingly. • The environmental parameter of CPSS-SB-R-PCM-Ag was 28.71 tons of CO 2 annually.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.105304
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.