MARATTO

article · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society

Optimization of methylene blue removal from aqueous solutions using activated carbon derived from coffee ground pyrolysis: A response surface methodology (RSM) approach for natural and cost-effective adsorption

202326 citationsOpen accessChouaib Doukkali University

In plain language

This research investigates the use of activated carbon derived from coffee ground pyrolysis as an affordable, natural adsorbent to remove methylene blue dye from water. Using a three-factor Box-Behnken design within response surface methodology, the adsorption process was evaluated across varying pH levels, initial dye concentrations, and adsorbent doses. The analysis established a mathematical model capturing how these operational factors and their interactions influence dye removal. Testing demonstrated that initial dye concentration and adsorbent mass significantly affected the decoloration process. Under optimal conditions of 0.05 grams per litre of adsorbent, 100 milligrams per litre of dye concentration, and a pH of 2.5, the process achieved a 91 percent dye degradation efficiency. The findings confirm that activated carbon derived from coffee grounds offers high efficiency for removing textile dyes from aqueous solutions.

Key takeaways

  • Activated carbon produced from coffee ground pyrolysis functions as an effective adsorbent for methylene blue dye removal.
  • Initial dye concentration and adsorbent mass both significantly influence the decoloration efficiency.
  • Optimal conditions yielded a 91 percent removal efficiency at pH 2.5, using 0.05 grams per litre of adsorbent and 100 milligrams per litre of dye.
  • A Box-Behnken response surface methodology model accurately predicted the experimental adsorption performance with a desirability score of roughly 0.986.

Why it matters

Discharging synthetic dyes from industries such as textile manufacturing creates significant water pollution challenges. Transforming spent coffee grounds into activated carbon provides a low-cost, waste-derived material to clean contaminated water. Demonstrating that agricultural by-products can efficiently strip hazardous colourants from aqueous solutions offers an accessible approach to wastewater remediation.

Commercialisation angle

The findings could enable textile manufacturers and industrial wastewater operators to treat dye-laden effluents using a low-cost, bio-based adsorbent. The research appears to be early-stage laboratory experimentation, focusing on bench-scale parameter optimisation rather than pilot-scale or full-scale industrial validation. Further development and scaling would be needed before practical industrial deployment.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the impact of operational factors on the adsorption capacity of methylene blue (MB) using a natural and cost-effective adsorbent, activated carbon from coffee grounds (CAP). The three-factor Box-Behnken design of the response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize this economically viable process with maximum efficiency. Through extensive experiments, the factors influencing the adsorption process were identified, their interactions were measured, and a mathematical model was developed. The experiment evaluated the quantity of MB adsorbed by CAP based on pH (2.5 - 10), initial MB concentration (10 - 100 mg/L), and CAP adsorbent amount (0.05 - 0.1 g/L). The results revealed that both concentration and mass significantly influenced the decoloration enhancement. Optimal conditions for achieving a 91 % degradation efficiency were determined as 0.05 g/L adsorbent weight, 100 mg/L dye concentration, and pH 2.5, with a desirability score of approximately 0.986, aligning closely with the predictions of the BBD model. In conclusion, this research addresses a research gap by demonstrating the high effectiveness of the CAP adsorbent in removing dyes from textiles.

Research topics

  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Dye analysis and toxicity

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jscs.2023.101695

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.