MARATTO

article · Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Optimization of HPLC Method by Using Central Composite Design for Simultaneous Estimation of Montelukast and Ebastine Dosage Form

20243 citationsDebre Tabor University

Abstract

In this work, a novel method for the simultaneous estimate of Montelukast (MONT) and Ebastine (EBAS) in bulk drugs was developed using Central Composite Design (CCD).A novel reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) approach for the simultaneous measurement of Montelukast and Ebastine in bulk and formulation is what this work aims to create and test.A novel reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) approach for the simultaneous measurement of Montelukast and Ebastine in bulk and formulation is what this work aims to create and test.With isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.8 ml min-1 and a diode array detector operating at 241 nm, the separation was accomplished using methanol and 0.02M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5 adjusted with diluted acetic acid) in the ratio of 80:20 v/v. Methanol composition (percent) (A), pH (B), and flow rate (C) were three independent variables that were examined.This method showed good linearity over a range of 2.5–25 μg/ml for both drugs. MONT limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.298 and 0.905μg/ml while LOD and LOQ for EBAS were 0.594 and 1.80For both drugs, this technique demonstrated high linearity throughout a range of 2.5–25 μg/ml. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for MONT were 0.298 and 0.905 μg/ml and 0.594 and 1.80 μg/ml for EBAS, respectively.The statistical data analysis determined that the Methanol composition and pH were the two independent variables that were most significant, with P 0.001. The suggested technique worked well and was optimised for the CCD model-based simultaneous estimate of both drugs.

Research topics

  • Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360x.2024.00293

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.