MARATTO

article · Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering

Optimization of F¯ Removal From Wastewater Utilizing Alternating Current Electrocoagulation Coupled With Sonication Using a Statistical Design Approach

2026Open accessJimma University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Combining electrochemical and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) has greatly mitigated the limitations of electrocoagulation (EC) in water treatment. This study examined the effectiveness of sonolysis (US)‐assisted alternating current (AC)–EC in reducing fluoride (F¯) from landfill leachate wastewater (LLW), with measurements of electrical energy consumption (EEC). The experimental results indicated that the US‐assisted AC–EC (US+AC–EC) process achieved greater reduction in F¯ from wastewater. To treat LLW, the US+AC–EC process different operational parameters were optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD). The effects of five independent parameters, such as sonication power (A) and pulse duty cycle (B), F¯ concentration (C) and current density (D), and reaction time (E) on F¯ reduction (%) and EEC were studied. A quadratic model was used to predict the decrease of F¯ and EEC under various conditions. ANOVA, or analysis of variance, was used to assess the significance of independent variables and their interactions. The optimal conditions for achieving maximum reduction of F¯ and the least amount of EEC were determined using statistical and mathematical methods. The optimal conditions for achieving the maximum amount of F¯ (81%) removed with the minimum amount of EEC (8.64 kWh/m 3 ) include the following: A—60 W, B—0.45, C—12 mg/L, D—0.6 A/dm 2 , and E—22.50 min. The US+AC–EC process has proved to be an effective and efficient method for removing F¯ from LLW with the least amount of EEC and that CCD is a viable method for improving the process. In conclusion, the US+AC–EC process has the potential to efficiently remove contaminants from wastewater.

Research topics

  • Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/apj.70263

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.