article · Journal of Food Quality
Noodles made from wheat flour have worldwide popularity because of the ease of preparation and the sensory property. However, recent demands for nutritious and gluten‐free foods necessitate the search for alternatives. This study explored alternative ingredients for producing gluten‐free noodles using a combined mixture‐process design for two components (cassava and Bambara groundnut flours) and process factors (whole egg and xanthan gum). Eight responses were modelled using relevant mixture‐process equations based on which the composition of the noodles were optimized using the desirability function. Subsequently, the nutrient content, physicochemical and sensory properties of the optimal noodles were compared with two other formulations to assess the contribution from cassava and Bambara groundnut flours. From the results, the optimal noodles ( S A ) comprising 70.43% cassava and 29.57% Bambara groundnut flours, 40% whole egg and 0.49% xanthan gum gave the highest desirability index ( D I ) of 0.82. Comparison of S A with noodles made from 85.06% cassava, 14.64% Bambara groundnut flours of D I , 0.71 ( S B ) and noodles made from 100% cassava and 0% Bambara groundnut flours of D I , 0.72 ( S C ), each with 40% whole egg and 0.49% xanthan gum as process variable revealed decreases in the nutrient (g/100 g) (protein, 10.50 ± 0.33; ash, 2.99 ± 0.06; fat, 2.62 ± 0.05), phytochemical (phenolic, 55.39 ± 4.32 mg GAE/g; flavonoids, 0.68 ± 0.03 mg QE/g; tannins, 0.37 ± 0.04 mg/g; antioxidant activity, 145.78 ± 8.42 mg GAE/g) contents and physical properties (browning index, 9.59 ± 0.44; hardness, 68.00 ± 8.19 N; chewiness, 29.32 ± 7.87 N and gumminess, 44.20 ± 5.45 N), whilst the consumer scores for sensory quality and overall acceptability increased when lower levels of Bambara groundnut were used in S B and S C . This shows that Bambara groundnut flour can improve the functionality and nutrient quality, but increasing the content in gluten‐free noodles can decrease consumer acceptability.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1155/jfq/5582669
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.