MARATTO

review

OP048 Conventional anatomical landmark versus preprocedural ultrasound for thoracic epidural analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <b>Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes:</b> I apply as an Anesthesiologist (Aged 35 years old or less) <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Thoracic epidural analgesia is the gold standard for major thoracic and upper abdominal surgeries. To effectively perform epidural analgesia, the epidural space should be localised accurately. Various techniques have been described the facilitate accurate needle insertion; including surface landmark and ultrasound-assisted techniques. Practitioners have relied on the surface palpation landmark method and loss extensively. However, this technique can sometimes be challenging to access the thoracic epidural area and carries substantial failure rates, especially in obese patients or those with oedema on the back This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of the US-assisted versus landmark-based thoracic epidural insertion via the paramedian route. <h3>Methods</h3> Randomized controlled trials were sought in six databases for a systematic review and meta-analysis. With a 95% confidence interval, a fixed-effects model calculated Risk Ratio or Mean Difference. Cochrane Risk of Bias assessed bias. Four RCTs were examined. The study was registered with PROSPERO with the identifying code CRD42022360527. <h3>Results</h3> Preprocedural ultrasound increased thoracic epidural placement first puncture success rate (RR= 1.28, 95% CI [1.05 to 1.56], P value= 0.02) and decreased the need for two or more skin punctures (MD= -2.41, 95% CI [-3.34 to -1.47], P value= 0.00001). The ultrasound group reduced needle redirections (RR= 0.6, 95% CI [0.38 to 0.94], P value= 0.02). The epidural block success rate was equal in both groups (RR= 1.02, 95% CI [0.96 to 1.07], P value= 0.6). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Thoracic epidural insertion is improved by ultrasound but not the success rate. Quality research with larger samples is needed to emphasise that.

Research topics

  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.48

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.