MARATTO

article · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IJIST)

OMAHE: An Adaptive Post-Quantum Hybrid Encryption Framework with Formal IND-CCA2 Security for Cloud Object

Abstract

Cloud storage systems face escalating security threats requiring cryptographic mechanisms that jointly optimise confidentiality, performance, and quantum resilience. Single-algorithm encryption schemes are inadequate against quantum-capable adversaries and contemporary latency constraints. This paper proposes the Optimised Multi-Algorithm Hybrid Encryption Framework (OMAHE), which integrates AES-256-GCM for bulk data encryption, ECDH with Curve25519 for ephemeral key exchange, and CRYSTALS-Kyber (NIST FIPS 203) for post-quantum key encapsulation. An adaptive algorithm-selection module employs eBPF-based runtime profiling heuristics to dynamically route encryption tasks according to file size, access frequency, and security-level policy.Evaluated on a 24-node private OpenStack cluster against three baselines (AES-256-GCM pre-shared key, RSA-2048/AES, and ChaCha20-Poly1305/ECDH), OMAHE achieved 2.14 GB/s throughput for large files — a 37.8% improvement over the RSA-2048/AES baseline — while reducing key establishment latency by 52.1%, CPU utilisation by 28.4%, and energy consumption by 36.4%. These improvements carry practical significance for cloud operators seeking to migrate to post-quantum cryptography without incurring prohibitive performance penalties; however, results are specific to the hardware configuration evaluated, and generalisation to heterogeneous deployments warrants further study. Formal IND-CCA2 security is established under the MLWE hardness assumption, with forward secrecy and mutual authentication properties verified via ProVerif version 2.05.

Research topics

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.64290/ijsat.v1i1.14

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.