article · PLoS ONE
Natural mineral water ("hora") and mineral-enriched surrounding soils are potential mineral supplements for cattle, yet comprehensive data on their physicochemical properties, mineral concentration and contribution to animal nutrition have been lacking. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the mineral composition and physicochemical properties of hora, and the mineral-enriched surrounding soils in the study area. Hora and the soil samples were collected in triplicate from each district, processed, and analyzed for physicochemical properties and mineral concentrations. The physicochemical parameters (temperature, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, pH, dissolved oxygen, total hardness, total turbidity, sulfate, nitrate, ammonia, chloride), and mineral concentration (calcium, potassium, sodium, magnesium, phosphorus, sulfur, iron, zinc, copper, molybdenum, selenium, and manganese in hora and soil samples were examined. Results revealed significant variation (p < 0.05) in physicochemical properties and mineral concentrations of hora across the districts. While many physicochemical properties of hora were found within the critical range for cattle, elevated electrical conductivity (up to 2900 µS/cm), total dissolved solids (up to 1700 mg/L), and ammonia (up to 1.14 mg/L), raise concerns for its suitability for cattle. Furthermore, soil concentrations of iron (31.4 g/kg), molybdenum (200 mg/kg), and manganese (921 mg/kg) exceeded maximum tolerable limits for cattle, indicating that unsupervised soil ingestion could negatively impact animal health. While these sources offer a promising natural mineral source, their high salinity and potentially toxic mineral levels in soil necessitate careful consideration for cattle nutrition. Therefore, further research is necessary to develop sustainable management strategies for hora and assess its long-term implications in animal nutrition and health.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348764
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.