MARATTO

article · Food Chemistry International

Nutritional Potential, Phytochemical Content, In Vivo Antioxidant, and Antanemic Potential of <i>Musa paradisiaca</i> Flower

2026Open accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

ABSTRACT This work was done in view to assess the nutritional capacity and impact of Musa paradisiaca flower extract on anemic rats. AOAC standard procedures were used to analyze the phytonutrients, minerals, and proximate composition. Six groups of 36 rats were allocated. Extract of flower (AEMPF) was administered to anemic rats in Groups 4, 5, and 6 at doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg, respectively. Group 1 consisted of untreated rats, Group 2 of untreated anemic rats, and Group 3 of anemic rats treated with the usual medication ferrous sulfate (Ranferon) at a dose of 5 mg/kg. Over the course of two days, an intraperitoneal injection of a phenylhydrazine solution (60 mg/kg) was used to induce anemia. Hematological, biochemical, and oxidative stress indicators were examined following a 2‐week course of treatment. According to the findings, these flowers include potassium (521.25 mg/100 g), fiber (52.06%), carotenoids (56.82 mg/100 g), polyphenols (129.29 mg/100 g), and vitamin C (5.63 mg/100 g). Hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red blood cells were all considerably ( p &lt; 0.05) higher in the AEMPF‐treated anemic groups than in the untreated anemic group. When AEMPF was administered to Groups 4, 5, and 6, the lipid profile, lactate dehydrogenase activity, direct bilirubin, and creatinine all showed substantial ( p &lt; 0.05) improvements in comparison to Groups 2 and 3. Superoxide dismutase, catalase, and reduced glutathione levels were significantly ( p &lt; 0.05) higher in Groups 4, 5, and 6 than in Group 3. The most effective dosage was 400 mg/kg, and hemolytic anemia could be treated with AEMPF.

Research topics

  • Banana Cultivation and Research
  • Cassava research and cyanide
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/fci2.70053

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.