MARATTO

article · Archiva zootechnica

Nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory evaluation of <i>dambu-nama</i> , a traditional shredded meat product, produced from camel meat, chevon, and pork

2025Open accessOsun State University

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory qualities of dambu-nama produced from camel meat, chevon, and pork using three processing methods: boiled only (20 min at 100 °C), boiled then fried (soybean oil, 180 °C, ~20 min), and boiled then oven-dried (120 °C). Fresh samples (8 kg) from each meat type were analysed for proximate composition and physicochemical properties; final products were assessed for proximate, mineral, vitamin, and sensory attributes, in a completely randomized design (CRD), 3 × 3 factorial arrangement. Fresh camel meat exhibited the highest (P &lt; 0.05) amount of protein (21.71 %), moisture (71.69 %), ash (2.16 %), calcium (9.70 mg/100g), potassium (274.50 mg/100g), and vitamins B 12 (2.32 mg/100g), B 2 (0.57 mg/100g), and D (0.87 mg/100g). Boiled-then-oven-dried chevon had the highest protein overall (P &lt; 0.05; 58.47 %), followed closely by boiled camel dambu-nama (58.12 %), while fried pork dambu-nama had the lowest protein (22.45 %). Generally, the boiled products obtained higher ether extract, while the fried products obtained lower protein content (P &lt; 0.05). Sensory evaluation revealed that pork dambu-nama obtained the highest score for juiciness (6.85) and overall acceptability (7.20). Overall, chevon and pork dambu-nama exhibit nutritional and eating qualities comparable to camel dambu-nama .

Research topics

  • Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Animal Diversity and Health Studies
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2478/azibna-2025-0014

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.