MARATTO

article · Environmental Technology

Nutrient and colour removal from healthcare wastewater: using gravel/ignimbrite bed constructed wetlands with <i>Cyperus alternifolius</i>

2026Open accessJimma University

Abstract

Healthcare wastewater (HCWW) is often rich in nutrients and pollutants that cause colour, posing serious environmental and public health risks if untreated. This study evaluated the effectiveness of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSFCWs) for removing nutrients and colour from HCWW, using locally available substrate materials, with and without <i>Cyperus alternifolius</i>. Four pilot-scale wetland systems were installed in parallel at the Jimma Institute of Technology to treat wastewater discharged from the Jimma Institute of Health, with hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4, 8, 12, and 24 days. Systems with an ignimbrite substrate planted with <i>Cyperus alternifolius</i> showed the highest removal rates: 96.33% for nitrate, 94.19% for phosphate, and 98.82% for colour at a 24-day HRT. The statistical analysis indicated that both substrate type and HRT significantly affect waste removal performance of the CW units (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). FTIR and XRD analysis of substrates before and after treatment revealed changes in functional groups and adsorption properties, supporting the treatment results. The findings indicate that Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands, which utilize ignimbrite beds and <i>Cyperus alternifolius</i>, offer a sustainable and eco-friendly approach for mitigating the risks associated with healthcare wastewater, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and directly targeting SDG 6, specifically 6.3 and 6.6. This approach is particularly beneficial in resource-limited areas.

Research topics

  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2026.2642955

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.