article · Scientific Reports
Cellular classification is essential for understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms. This paper introduces a novel approach that employs two complementary loss functions within a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) framework for processing images from the Human Protein Atlas dataset. Our method introduces the "Salivary Gland" loss function (SG-Loss), which addresses missing pixel imputation through a unique computational mechanism that models the graded secretion patterns of acinar cells, incorporating multi-scale contextual information to reconstruct incomplete cellular features. This is paired with our innovative "Pituitary Gland" loss function (PG-Loss), which preserves structural integrity through a novel homeostatic regularization approach that adaptively weights pixel relationships based on subcellular compartment boundaries, unlike conventional smoothing techniques. The SG-Loss specifically targets discontinuities in protein expression patterns, while PG-Loss maintains biological plausibility by enforcing organelle-specific constraints learned from annotated training data. Our proposed Dual-Gland GAN demonstrates superior performance with an Inception Score of 9.83 (± 0.31) and MS-SSIM Diversity of 0.187 (± 0.021). The model achieves impressive precision and recall metrics (0.872 and 0.835, respectively), resulting in an F1-score of 0.853. Training stability is reflected in minimal generator and discriminator loss variance (0.028 and 0.032) with convergence achieved in 78 epochs. Comprehensive evaluation shows high quality and diversity scores (0.912 and 0.894), yielding a combined score of 0.903, demonstrating the effectiveness of our biologically inspired approach for cellular image generation and classification. The results also prove the efficiency of the architecture in enhancing the classification results.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-11254-w
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.