article · Journal of Power Sources
NASICON-type solid electrolytes feature prominently in the improved safety and energy density of solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). Achieving high ionic conductivity in these electrolytes is key to optimizing their performance. In this study, we introduced a new class of NASICON-type materials by doping arsenic into the Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 framework, creating a series of Li 1.3+x Al 0.3 As x Ti 1.7-x (PO 4 ) 3 phases with varying arsenic content (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3), synthesized using the standard solid-state reaction method. X-ray diffraction confirmed the successful formation of the Li 1.3+x Al 0.3 As x Ti 1.7-x (PO 4 ) 3 phases, which was further validated by Rietveld refinement . Structural analyses through FT-IR, Raman spectroscopy , NMR , and ICP-AES studies validate the effective incorporation of arsenic into the lattice. Among the different compositions , Li 1.5 As 0.2 Al 0.3 Ti 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 phase stood out due to its high relative density of 89 % and its pore-free microstructure, as observed through scanning electron microscopy results, revealing the largest grain and crystallite size. Notably, doping with arsenic resulted in a significant enhancement in ionic conductivity , increasing from 5.34 × 10 −5 Ω −1 cm −1 for Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 to 8.57 × 10 −4 Ω −1 cm −1 for the Li 1.5 As 0.2 Al 0.3 Ti 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 at 25 °C. With a lithium transference number of 0.99, and a conduction mechanism largely unaffected by changes in temperature or composition, demonstrating its suitability as a promising candidate for solid electrolyte applications. • Arsenic-doped NASICON phases synthesized via solid-state reaction. • Li 1.5 As 0.2 Al 0.3 Ti 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 showed 89 % relative density and pore-free microstructure. • Ionic conductivity reached 8.57 × 10 −4 Ω −1 cm −1 at 25 °C for x = 0.2. • Lithium transference number of 0.99 ensures excellent ionic mobility.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237103
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.