MARATTO

article · Drug Development Research

Neuroprotective Effect of Empagliflozin/Rivastigmine in Alzheimer's Disease Rat Model: Optimization of Multifaceted Mechanism of Action

Abstract

This study assessed the neuroprotective potential of empagliflozin (EMPA) as antidiabetic drug on glucose metabolism, comparing it to rivastigmine (RIVA) as standard treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and their combination. Male rats were sorted into five groups. Group I served as the control, while groups II, III, IV, and V received the scopolamine plus heavy metal mixture for AD induction. Groups III and IV were administered RIVA and EMPA, respectively, and group V received both treatments. Cognitive function was evaluated behaviorally. Subsequently, glucose levels, acetylcholinesterase, oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers were assessed. Alongside the brain histopathological changes, the expression of phosphorylated tau protein was assessed. Moreover, glycolytic enzymes and glucose transporters were assessed using PCR analysis. The findings were attributed to a notable suppressive impact of EMPA on lipid peroxidation, acetylcholinesterase, glucose levels, phosphorylated tau protein, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and neuropathological changes, while enhancing antioxidant and interleukin-10 levels. It also improves glucose metabolism. The findings suggest that EMPA may be a viable candidate for future therapeutic exploration in AD, which has a multifaceted mechanism of action encompassing anti-neuroinflammation, antioxidant stress, and enhanced glucose metabolism, as well as decreased acetylcholinesterase activity and phosphorylated tau protein levels. Interestingly, combined treatment showed a superior effect than EMPA alone.

Research topics

  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/ddr.70180

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.