MARATTO

article · Benha Medical Journal

Neonatal Cord Blood PH versus Eucapnic PH as a Predictor for NICU Admission

2024Open accessBenha University

Abstract

Background: For clinicians to determine the possibility for neonate brain damage and guide therapeutic decisions to avoid long-term complications, as cerebral palsy involving umbilical artery cord PH, base deficit, and lactic acid, the majority of biomarkers that are utilized for assessing fetal wellbeing, neonatal metabolic acidosis, and its associated complications in newborns are inaccurate and non-specific. On the other hand, the PHeucap demonstrates that it is the best biomarker and predictor for newborn metabolic acidosis and the obstacles that are associated with it. Aim: To evaluate the value of neonatal cord eucapnic PH in prediction of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in newborn subjected to perinatal asphyxia. Patients and methods: This prospective cohort investigation has been performed conducted on 40 newborns delivered at Benha university in Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), from 1 March 2023 till 1 March 2024 who subjected to perinatal asphyxia and cord blood pH and eucapnic pH were measured and correlated with parameters of morbidity and mortality. Results: ROC analysis (Receiver operation Curve) showed that eucapnic PH had best prediction for NICU admission with sensitivity (90.91%) and specificity (58.62%) at cut-off point(7.03), while umbilical artery (UA)cord PH had sensitivity (63.64%) and specificity (55.85%)at cut-off point(6.85). a significant positive correlation has been detected between UA cord and pH euc-n and between pH euc-n and UAco2 with(r=0.369, P=0.019). (r=0.789, P

Research topics

  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/bmfj.2024.324769.2214

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.