MARATTO

article · Journal of Accounting Business and Management (JABM)

National Culture and Accounting Conservatism

Abstract

We test whether Hofstede (1980) cultural dimensions affect accounting conservatism in the banking sector. Our sample is 3593 banks-year observations from four countries. We find significant positive effect of uncertainty avoidance and power distance on accounting conservatism and a significant negative effect of individualism and masculinity on accounting conservatism. We robust our findings using cultural dimensions of House et al. (2004). We contribute to the literature as follows. First; we focus on the banking sector that has been marginalized by many researchers. Second; we cover the most recent period from 2013 to 2020. Third; we found new evidences of the significant relationships between the four dimensions of Hofstede (1980) and accounting conservatism in the banking sector. Fourth; the random effect method for panel data for regression is used in this study to control fixed years effect which enabled us to explain the role of culture in accounting conservatism.

Research topics

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Accounting and Organizational Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.31966/jabminternational.v31i2.1075

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.