MARATTO

article · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Mycotoxin and metallic element concentrations in peanut products sold in Ugandan markets

201720 citationsOpen accessMakerere University

In plain language

Concerns regarding food-borne carcinogens have risen alongside cancer rates in Uganda. To examine potential risks, mycotoxins and metallic elements were measured in processed peanuts purchased from four Kampala markets and compared with peanut samples processed traditionally in homes. Laboratory analyses screened for multiple contaminants, including various aflatoxins, fumonisins, other mycotoxins, and several heavy metals. Aflatoxins were the primary mycotoxins detected in significant quantities. A substantial proportion of the tested products exceeded standard acceptable thresholds for total aflatoxins, with market-processed items showing significantly higher aflatoxin levels than those processed at home. In contrast, metallic element levels generally remained below regulatory safety limits. Furthermore, roasting and the duration of grinding did not significantly alter the concentrations of aflatoxins or metallic elements.

Key takeaways

  • Aflatoxins were the predominant mycotoxins detected in significant amounts in peanut products.
  • Between 34 and 55 percent of samples exceeded the 20 parts per billion acceptable limit for total aflatoxins.
  • Market-processed peanut samples had significantly higher aflatoxin concentrations than home-processed peanuts.
  • Metallic element levels generally complied with maximum acceptable regulatory thresholds.
  • Roasting and the length of grinding time had no significant effect on toxicant concentrations.

Why it matters

Peanuts are a widely consumed food, but contamination with carcinogenic aflatoxins poses serious health risks to the public. These findings show that commercially processed peanuts in urban markets carry higher contamination levels than those prepared at home. Routine screening and stricter monitoring in public markets are essential to protect consumer health and enforce food safety standards.

Commercialisation angle

This research provides baseline data rather than a commercial product, serving food safety regulators, public health agencies, and food processing businesses seeking to design monitoring protocols. Because processing methods like roasting and grinding do not eliminate these toxins, the findings point to a need for quality control interventions earlier in the supply chain, though the abstract does not indicate a specific commercialisation pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of cancer among Ugandans has aroused consumer concerns about food-borne carcinogens. This study sought to compare mycotoxin and metallic element concentrations in processed peanuts sold in selected markets in Kampala, Uganda to those traditionally prepared in homes. Market-processed peanut samples (n = 33) were purchased from four markets. Control samples (n = 5) were unground peanuts bought from markets but processed in homes by traditional methods. Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2; Fumonisins; Deoxynivalenol, Nivalenol, Ochratoxin A, T2 toxin, Zearalenone, and Zearalenol were analyzed by LC/MS/MS while As, B, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mg, Ni, Pb and Zn were analyzed by ICP/MS. The data was statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon scores (rank sums) or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Aflatoxins were the predominant mycotoxins found in significant amounts. 55 and 34% of the samples had concentrations of total aflatoxins greater than 20 ppb (FDA acceptable limit). There were significantly higher concentrations of aflatoxins in market-processed than in home-processed samples. Metallic element concentrations were generally below FDA maximum acceptable concentrations. Roasting and duration of grinding had no significant effect on aflatoxin or metallic element concentrations. There is a need for food-borne toxicant monitoring of food sold in public markets in Uganda.

Research topics

  • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Food Safety and Hygiene

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2017.1313925

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.