article · European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Background: Evidence on motivational interviewing for alcohol use disorder in hospitalized psychiatric settings in Zambia is limited. This study assessed its effect on harm reduction among hospitalized adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD) in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted among 84 inpatients diagnosed with alcohol use disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Participants were assigned to either motivational interviewing plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores were measured at baseline and 6 weeks. Harm reduction was defined as improvement in AUDIT score and alcohol-risk category. Results: The median age was 32 years, 89.3% were male, and 90.5% had alcohol dependence at baseline. Overall, 71/84 (84.5%) participants achieved harm reduction. This did not differ significantly between the groups (85.7% vs. 83.3%, p > 0.05). The median AUDIT score decreased from 25 to 11 (p = 0.0001). Older age predicted harm reduction (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28), while a monthly income of K1,500–K5,000 predicted lower odds versus > K5,000 (AOR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01–0.74). Conclusion: Motivational interviewing showed no significant added benefit over treatment as usual, although substantial short-term harm reduction was observed overall. Larger trials are needed.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2026.8.2.70281
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.