article · International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
In response to the restrictions of the teacher-centred approach, collaborative learning has been introduced as a more inclusive pedagogy that can promote students’ classroom interactions, active engagement, and learning satisfaction. Based on this, the current study seeks to explore Moroccan EFL public high school students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning in argumentative writing. In light of a mixed-method approach, the study employed a questionnaire to gather data from 158 students across three public high schools in Casablanca. This is followed by a semi-structured interview with 12 participants for a deeper understanding of the issue. The results displayed that participants held an overall positive attitude toward collaborative writing, which they mainly attributed to its effectiveness in providing a space for sharing opinions, exchanging feedback, and forging meaningful relationships. However, low levels of English language, noise, and unequal participation were identified as key barriers to effective group argumentative writing. These results suggest that collaborative writing must be effectively integrated into Moroccan EFL classes to enhance students’ argumentative writing performance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.36892/ijlls.v8i2.2562
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.