MARATTO

article · Applied Sciences

Modeling and Optimization of Phenolic Compound Adsorption from Olive Wastewater Using XAD-4 Resin, Activated Carbon, and Chitosan Biosorbent

2026Open accessMohamed I University

Abstract

This study proposes a circular economy strategy to recover phenolic compounds by valorizing shrimp shell waste into a chitosan biosorbent (CH-B). Its adsorption efficiency was evaluated compared to commercial activated carbon (AC) and synthetic XAD-4 resin. Kinetic analysis revealed that while both pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models exhibited high correlations (R2 ≥ 0.96), both CH-B and XAD-4 resin were best described by the PFO model. This aligns with diffusion-controlled processes consistent with the porous and physical nature of these adsorbents. In contrast, AC followed the PSO model. Isotherm modeling indicated that CH-B and AC fit the Temkin model, reflecting heterogeneous surfaces, whereas XAD-4 followed the Langmuir model (monolayer adsorption). Notably, CH-B exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity (qm) of 229.2 mg/g, significantly outperforming XAD-4 (104.8 mg/g) and AC (90.2 mg/g). Thermodynamic and kinetic modeling confirmed that the adsorption mechanism was governed by a combination of electrostatic interactions, π–π stacking, and hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl/amine groups of chitosan and phenolic compounds. Optimization using Box–Behnken design for CH-B showed optimal acidic pH and moderate temperature but non-significant effect of CH-B dose in the experimental domain. Optimisation results showed unexpected high removal efficiency at low CH-B dosages. A tentative explanation may be adsorbent aggre-gation, which needs to be confirmed by further experimental evidence.

Research topics

  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/app16031231

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.