MARATTO

article · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Model-agnostic assessment of dark energy after DESI DR1 BAO

202558 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Western Cape

In plain language

Recent measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument suggest possible evidence for dynamical dark energy when analysed alongside cosmic microwave background and supernova data using specific dark energy models. However, this signal depends heavily on the chosen framework, showing weaker significance in alternative formulations. To remove model dependence, distance measures and the equation of state of dark energy were reconstructed directly from observational data without assuming a specific late-time model. This data-driven analysis indicates that model-agnostic evidence for dynamical dark energy is not statistically significant. The approach also produces model-independent constraints on fundamental cosmological parameters, specifically the present-day Hubble constant and matter-energy density. While early-time distance priors derived from the standard model were incorporated, the outcomes remain broadly consistent across alternative models that do not diverge substantially from standard cosmological assumptions.

Key takeaways

  • Model-agnostic reconstruction reveals that observational evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI data is not statistically significant.
  • Previous indications of dynamical dark energy depend strongly on assuming specific parametrisations such as the w0waCDM model.
  • Reconstructing distance measures directly from observational data provides model-independent constraints on the Hubble constant and present matter-energy density.
  • Findings remain broadly stable across different early-time cosmological models, provided they do not deviate substantially from the standard model.

Why it matters

Understanding dark energy is essential to determining the expansion rate and ultimate fate of the universe. Demonstrating that apparent evidence for dynamical dark energy weakens when tested independently of specific theoretical models helps astrophysicists refine standard cosmological frameworks. It prevents premature shifts in scientific consensus by separating genuine observational signals from assumptions embedded in particular mathematical models.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract Baryon acoustic oscillation measurements by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (Data Release 1) have revealed exciting results that show evidence for dynamical dark energy at ∼ 3 σ when combined with cosmic microwave background and type Ia supernova observations. These measurements are based on the w 0 w a CDM model of dark energy. The evidence is less in other dark energy models such as the w CDM model. In order to avoid imposing a dark energy model, we reconstruct the distance measures and the equation of the state of dark energy independent of any dark energy model and driven only by observational data. Our results show that the model-agnostic (in terms of late-time models) evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI is not significant. Our analysis also provides model-independent constraints on cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant and the matter-energy density parameter at present. Although we used CMB distance priors (not full CMB data) from a ΛCDM early-time model, our results remain largely similar for other cosmological models, provided that these models do not differ significantly from the standard model.

Research topics

  • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/120

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.