MARATTO

article · Clinical and Translational Neuroscience

Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Atherosclerosis: High-Volume Versus Low-Volume Centres

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Background: Intracranial stenting is still feasible, but its effectiveness is still investigational. Our study investigated outcomes of endovascular treatment in high-volume and low-volume centres. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 36 patients with intracranial atherosclerosis who underwent endovascular treatment from January 2014 to June 2016 at three low-volume centres (n = 18), and a single high-volume centre (n = 18). Detailed periprocedural records, as well as clinical and radiological follow-up data, were revised through at least one-year post-procedure. The outcome parameters included successful revascularization, occurrence of any death, stroke, and/or Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) after intervention or during the follow-up period, and restenosis (≥50%). Results: The successful revascularization rate was 97.2%. The 30-day rate of any death, stroke, and/or TIA was 13.9%. At a median clinical follow-up of 18 months, the rate of any death, stroke, and/or TIA was 27.8%. Rates of any death, stroke, and/or TIA at 30 days and 18 months were higher among patients treated in low-volume centres versus those treated in high-volume centres but without reaching statistical significance (22.2% versus 5.6%, p = 0.188; and 38.9% versus 16.7%, p = 0.137, respectively). Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, our study showed a higher incidence of death, stroke and/or TIA among patients treated in the low-volume centre compared to those treated in the high-volume centre.

Research topics

  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ctn9010006

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.