MARATTO

article · Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Mid-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-to-Moderate Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In plain language

The abstract on record is too brief for a reliable plain-language summary, so none has been generated.

Abstract

Mid-term mortality and disabling stroke rates in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with either transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement were similar.

Research topics

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0250

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.