MARATTO

article · BMC Microbiology

Microbial risks of raw camel milk: Salmonella identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling in the pastoral settings of Somali region, Ethiopia

2026Open accessJigjiga University

In plain language

Camel milk serves as a vital food source in pastoral areas of the Somali region of Ethiopia, where it is commonly consumed untreated. An investigation of 384 raw milk samples across production chains revealed an overall Salmonella recovery rate of 43.0 percent, consisting of both typhoidal and non-typhoidal strains. Contamination rates were particularly high in collection buckets and bulk milk, driven by poor hand hygiene, irregular container cleaning, and unsmoked buckets. Laboratory susceptibility testing demonstrated widespread antimicrobial resistance, including complete resistance to erythromycin and high resistance to ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Three quarters of tested non-typhoidal isolates exhibited multidrug resistance. These findings highlight significant foodborne bacterial contamination in raw camel milk linked directly to handling practices, presenting notable microbial risks and antimicrobial resistance concerns for consuming communities.

Key takeaways

  • Salmonella was detected in 43.0 percent of raw camel milk samples, with non-typhoidal strains accounting for 28.4 percent and typhoidal strains for 14.6 percent.
  • Milk contamination was strongly associated with poor hand hygiene, unsmoked buckets, and irregular cleaning of storage and milking containers.
  • All tested isolates showed resistance to erythromycin, while 87.5 percent were resistant to ampicillin and 62.5 percent to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
  • Seventy-five percent of tested non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates exhibited multidrug resistance.

Why it matters

Raw camel milk is a staple food in pastoralist communities, but consuming it unpasteurised can cause severe foodborne infections. The presence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains undermines standard medical treatments, creating substantial public health hazards. Understanding how handling practices contribute to contamination enables targeted hygiene interventions to protect consumers and reduce the spread of drug-resistant pathogens.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract identifies hygiene gaps and bacterial profiles rather than developing a commercial product. The findings provide an evidence base that could inform the design of targeted milk sanitisation equipment, dairy hygiene training programmes, or rapid diagnostic test kits for pastoral dairy supply chains. Any potential technological solutions remain at an early concept stage, as the abstract does not describe or evaluate an applied commercial intervention.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract Background Camel milk is the primary means of ensuring food security in pastoral settings of the Somali Region, where usually consumed raw. This untreated camel milk is believed to be a major source of foodborne illnesses; yet, the microbial risks—especially Salmonella contamination of raw camel milk and its antibiograms—are poorly understood in the area. Thus, the study was conducted to identify Salmonella contamination in raw camel milk, determine its antibiograms, and assess community perceptions and public health risks of raw camel milk consumption in the study area. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess community awareness in public health risks of raw camel milk and identify Salmonella contamination in the production chains: udders, buckets, and bulk milk of raw camel milk, and determine its antibiogram. A total of 384 raw camel milk samples were collected from buckets ( n = 225), bulk milk ( n = 49), and udders ( n = 110) and bacteriologically analyzed by isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Chi-square, Phi, and Cramer’s V-value were employed to assess the factors and the strength of associations with Salmonella recovery rates, respectively. Result Out of 384 total samples analyzed, 165 Salmonella isolates were recovered, representing an overall recovery rate of 43.0%. These isolates comprised 56 typhoidal Salmonella species (representing 14.6% of total samples) and 109 non-typhoidal Salmonella species (representing 28.4% of total samples). A high recovery rate of Salmonella was observed in bucket milk (109; 48.4%), and bulk milk (20; 40.8%), and bacterial isolation rate were strongly associated (all, p < 0.05; Phi = 0.599 to 0.491) with poor milkers’ hand hygiene (122; 84.1%), buckets and bulk milk not cleaned regularly (84; 76.4%, and 17; 70.8%) respectively, and unsmoked buckets (92; 68.7%). The invitro antibiogram confirmed that isolates were resistant to Erythromycin (100%), Ampicillin (87.5%), and Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (62.5%), while showing high susceptibility to Streptomycin and Amikacin (100%) and Ceftriaxone (66.7%). Nine (75%) isolates of non-typhoidal Salmonella species developed multidrug resistance (MDR), resistant to Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, Ampicillin, and Chloramphenicol. Notably, only the non-typhoidal Salmonella were resistant to Ceftriaxone (41.7%); conversely, the typhoidal Salmonella were highly susceptible (83.3%). Also, all typhoidal Salmonella isolates (100%) were completely resistant to Ampicillin. Conclusion A high prevalence of both typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella species is identified in raw camel milk under poor hygienic practices of milking and public health awareness. The presence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates may have a public health concern in causing food-borne illness and posing a drug resistance threat.

Research topics

  • Animal Diversity and Health Studies
  • Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Infant Nutrition and Health

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12866-026-05534-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.