MARATTO

article · Water Practice & Technology

Microbial–physicochemical interplay in Iko River estuary, unraveling the hidden mystery in bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons

2024Open accessUniversity of Calabar

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aquatic microbial communities are relatively complex with a high level of prokaryotic diversities. Standard and novel microbiological, analytical, and statistical techniques were employed in the collection, analysis, and comprehensive study of the samples. From the study, the mean values of total heterotrophic bacteria were determined to be 1.35 ± 0.18 (×107), 1.59 ± 0.64 (×107), and 1.56 ± 0.52 (×107) for upstream, midstream, and downstream, respectively, while the mean values for crude oil-utilizing bacteria were 1.08 ± 0.12 (×106), 1.28 ± 0.58 (×106), and 1.24 ± 0.44 (×106) for upstream, midstream, and downstream, respectively. The mean concentrations of physicochemical parameters and heavy metals obtained in the benthic sediment were significantly higher than the mean concentrations in the water samples (tidal and intertidal) (p < 0.02). The result of the component analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons (including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) revealed significantly higher levels in the sediment than tidal and intertidal water. Structural metagenomics revealed seven top phyla, namely, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Fusobacteria, and Chloroflexi. The significantly (p < 0.05) high levels of hydrocarbon-utilizing microorganisms in Iko River estuary can be taken as a sensitive index of environmental exposure to hydrocarbon pollutants in the estuary. This research revealed the response patterns of microorganisms to natural and anthropogenic gradients toward sustainability in Iko River estuary.

Research topics

  • Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2024.309

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.