MARATTO

article · Curationis

Mental Health Review Board Members’ understanding of the policy guideline on 72-hour assessment

20241 citationOpen accessUniversity of Limpopo

Abstract

Certain issues regarding dissatisfaction related to improper implementation of the 72-h policy guideline persist. Therefore, MHRB recommends that there should be skilled Mental Health Care Practitioners, adequate infrastructure, community involvement, and family and stakeholder collaboration to improve care towards the involuntary MHCUs.Contribution: The study illustrated there is a need to strengthen the implementation of 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs through ensuring enough human resources, designated facilities and involvement of the community as raised by the MHRBs.

Research topics

  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2662

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.