article · Ethnobotany Research and Applications
Background: Kulbo Forest in southwestern Ethiopia harbours a rich diversity of medicinal plants and associated indigenous knowledge. Despite its importance for local healthcare, ethnobotanical information from the area remains largely undocumented. Methods: A cross-sectional ethnobotanical study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 138 informants. Additional information was gathered through focus group discussions, guided field walks, and market surveys. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), and preference ranking techniques. Results: A total of 70 medicinal plant species belonging to 37 families were documented for the treatment of 55 human ailments. Asteraceae was the most represented family, accounting for 14.3% of the recorded species. Herbs constituted the dominant growth form (61.4%), while leaves were the most frequently utilized plant parts (39.3%). Oral administration was the primary route of remedy application (54.6%). Informant Consensus Factor values were highest for respiratory ailments (ICF = 0.92) and skin diseases (ICF = 0.83), indicating strong agreement among informants regarding treatments for these conditions. Most medicinal plants (68.2%) were harvested from wild habitats, and agricultural expansion was identified as the leading threat to medicinal plant resources. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the continued importance of medicinal plants and indigenous knowledge in supporting primary healthcare in rural communities. However, increasing anthropogenic pressures threaten both medicinal plant diversity and associated traditional knowledge. Conservation measures, sustainable harvesting practices, and further phytochemical and pharmacological investigations are needed to ensure the long-term sustainability and utilization of these valuable resources. Keywords: Ethnobotany; Indigenous knowledge; Medicinal plants; Traditional medicine; Kulbo Forest; Ethiopia.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32859/era.34.63.1-17
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.