MARATTO

article · Discover Civil Engineering

Mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete with partial replacement of fly ash by agricultural waste ashes

202524 citationsOpen accessKwara State University

Abstract

Abstract Concrete, primarily composed of cement, contributes substantially to environmental degradation due to high CO₂ emissions. With cement production increasing by approximately 7% annually, geopolymer concrete (GPC) offers a sustainable alternative. By using industrial waste ashes as a primary binder instead of cement, GPC reduces energy consumption, mitigates waste disposal issues, and significantly lowers carbon emissions. This study assessed the effects of Rice Husk Ash (RHA), Cassava Peel Ash (CPA), and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) as partial replacements for Fly Ash (FA) in GPC, focusing on compressive and split tensile strengths. The mix preparation involved an alkaline solution prepared in advance, combined with FA, RHA, SCBA, CPA, sharp sand, and granite in a 1:1 liquid-to-solid ratio. The mix was cast, oven-cured for 4 h, and tested at 7, 14, and 28 days. The 100% Fly Ash (FA) mix achieved the highest compressive strength of 2.3 N/mm 2 at 28 days due to its low SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratio (0.28) and high alumina content, which promote efficient geopolymerization. In terms of tensile strength, the 50% FA + 50% CPA mix exhibited the highest value of 0.65 N/mm 2 at 28 days, surpassing the 100% FA mix (0.30 N/mm 2 ) and the 50% FA + 50% SCBA mix (0.60 N/mm 2 ). The relatively low strength values are attributed to the short 4-h curing period, which limited full geopolymerization. This study demonstrates that using agricultural waste ashes in geopolymer concrete promotes sustainability and highlights how SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratios influence compressive and tensile strength, guiding optimized mix designs.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44290-025-00272-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.