MARATTO

article · Engineering and Applied Science Letters

Mathematical review of second-order macroscopic traffic flow models

Abstract

As urbanization intensifies and traffic demand continues to grow, understanding and modelling vehicular dynamics in complex transportation systems has become increasingly important. Second-order macroscopic traffic flow models provide a powerful framework for capturing the evolution of both traffic density and velocity, offering significant advantages over first-order formulations. Despite extensive developments in this field, the literature lacks a unified mathematical synthesis that systematically organizes and compares the wide range of second-order models. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive review of second-order macroscopic traffic flow models, tracing their evolution from foundational formulations in the 1970s to recent advancements up to 2024. The review adopts a structured methodology, drawing on major academic databases to identify models based on their mathematical formulation and practical relevance. The models are classified into key families, including relaxation-based, kinetic, viscous, anisotropic, nonlocal, and multi-class formulations, providing a coherent taxonomy of the field. In addition to cataloguing model equations, this study synthesizes their fundamental mathematical properties, including hyperbolicity, stability, well-posedness, and parameter identifiability. The review further examines how successive models address limitations of earlier approaches, such as non-physical wave propagation and insufficient representation of driver behaviour. Finally, emerging trends are discussed, including the integration of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies, nonlocal interactions, and data-driven modelling approaches.

Research topics

  • Traffic control and management
  • Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Traffic and Road Safety

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30538/psrp-easl2026.0136

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.