MARATTO

article · Mathematics

Machine Learning Hazard Estimation with Valid Bootstrap Inference for Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring

2026Open accessCairo University

Abstract

Reliability studies frequently employ progressive censoring schemes that remove surviving units during testing, yet statistical inference under such designs remains vulnerable to parametric model misspecification. When distributional assumptions fail, conventional maximum likelihood estimators converge to systematically biased limits, producing confidence intervals with severely degraded coverage. We develop a flexible inferential framework that models the hazard function through a neural network architecture, avoiding commitment to a parametric family. To quantify uncertainty, we introduce a stratified weighted bootstrap procedure that preserves the dependency structure induced by progressive removals. We establish that the proposed estimator achieves the minimax optimal nonparametric rate n−α/(2α+1) for α-smooth hazard functions and prove that the bootstrap consistently approximates the sampling distribution, yielding asymptotically valid pointwise confidence intervals for the survival function. A local asymptotic analysis precisely characterizes the efficiency–robustness tradeoff. Comprehensive simulations comparing against parametric methods, penalized splines, piecewise exponential models, and kernel estimators demonstrate that our method maintains 92–94% coverage under misspecification, whereas parametric alternatives collapse to 40–45% and simpler nonparametric methods achieve only 85–91%. The neural network architecture provides 23–29% lower integrated mean squared error than penalized splines using the same bootstrap, confirming that both components of our framework contribute to performance. Computational requirements remain practical: parallelized bootstrap inference completes in under 25 s on an 8-core processor for typical sample sizes. Application to electronic component lifetime data illustrates how the methodology yields materially different reliability assessments with direct implications for warranty planning.

Research topics

  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Reliability and Maintenance Optimization

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/math14091480

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.