MARATTO

article · Energy Technology

Machine Learning Framework for Optimising Regeneration of Lithium‐Ion Battery Cathode Materials

2026Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

The rapid growth of the lithium‐ion battery (LIB) market, driven by the rise of electric vehicles and renewable energy integration, has intensified the need to address battery degradation and the environmental impact of spent LIBs. Direct regeneration has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional recycling methods, offering a low‐energy, environmentally friendly, closed‐loop approach for restoring degraded cathode materials. However, identifying optimal regeneration parameters remains experimentally intensive and complex. This study explores the potential of machine learning (ML), particularly artificial neural networks (ANN), to optimise the regeneration process and to evaluate the battery's remaining useful life (RUL) and state of health (SoH) of regenerated cathode materials using solid‐state regeneration methods. A structured ML‐driven framework was developed and applied to two representative chemistries, lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP), using experimentally derived datasets. Across both systems, ANN consistently outperformed other algorithms, achieving high predictive accuracy ( R 2 up to 0.99) while identifying refined regeneration conditions that improved specific capacity, enhanced cycling stability, and reduced thermal input. The model further demonstrated strong generalisation capability by accurately predicting performance under unseen regeneration conditions. These results establish a transferable ML‐based optimisation framework for regenerated LIB cathodes and highlight its potential to reduce experimental workloads, improve energy efficiency, and support sustainable battery recovery.

Research topics

  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Advancements in Battery Materials

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/ente.202502551

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.