article · Next Energy
Enhancing heat-recovery efficiency is an important component of industrial energy management and emissions-reduction strategies. This study presents a machine-learning-based surrogate-modeling framework for predicting the logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD) in heat-exchanger applications. A synthetic thermal dataset containing 10,000 operating scenarios and 20 numerical variables was evaluated. Because the clean LMTD variable is deterministically related to other generated thermodynamic quantities, a noisy LMTD variable was selected as the prediction target to provide a more realistic assessment of predictive robustness. Four regression algorithms were compared: Linear Regression, Random Forest Regressor, Extra Trees Regressor, and Gradient Boosting Regressor. Dataset-quality screening identified four zero-variance predictors, which were removed, as well as a physically questionable cold-outlet-temperature variable that was explicitly treated as a limitation of the synthetic dataset. Three leakage-aware feature-set experiments were conducted to distinguish prediction based on direct thermodynamic relationships from prediction based on broader operating information. Using the reduced feature set after removing direct heat-load and LMTD-related variables, Linear Regression achieved the best performance, with R² = 0.7644, RMSE = 10.6492 K, and MAE = 8.4317 K. When the heat-load, LMTD, and temperature-equation inputs were removed, model performance decreased to approximately zero or became negative, demonstrating that predictive capability depended strongly on thermodynamically informative variables. Input-perturbation testing indicated limited performance degradation under moderate additional synthetic noise. A surrogate-based optimization case study was also presented as a numerical demonstration; however, its predicted operating point should not be interpreted as physically implementable because of the limitations of the synthetic dataset. The proposed framework is therefore positioned as a leakage-aware diagnostic and surrogate-modeling workflow rather than as a replacement for the analytical LMTD equation or as an experimentally validated heat-exchanger model.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nxener.2026.100885
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.