MARATTO

article · Journal of Blood Medicine

<p>The association between ABO blood group distribution and peptic ulcer disease: a cross-sectional study from Ethiopia</p>

201914 citationsOpen accessDebre Berhan University

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that ABO blood group antigens are associated with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). There are limited sources regarding the association of blood groups with PUD patients in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess the association between ABO blood group distribution, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), smoking, alcohol, coffee, and PUD at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken, and a total of 63 endoscopically confirmed PUD patients and 63 healthy controls were screened for ABO blood grouping using the standard slide agglutination reaction. Stool antigens were checked to determine Helicobacter pylori status of PUD patients. Chi-square and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: The ABO blood group distribution of PUD patients was 19.04% (12/63), 19.04% (12/63), 11.11% (7/63), 50.79% (32/63) for blood group A, B, AB, and O, respectively, while among control groups it was 25.39% (16/63), 23.80% (15/63), 12.69% (8/63), and 38.09% (24/63) for blood group A, B, AB, and O, respectively. 34.1% (22/63) of PUD patients had gastric ulcer and 65.9% (41/63) had duodenal ulcer. There was statistically a significant association between sex ( p =0.001), use of NSAIDs ( p =0.001), smoking cigarette ( p =0.014), alcohol consumption ( p =0.028), and PUD. Conclusion: Although PUD trended as more prevalent among patients with blood group O than other blood group types their association was not statistically significant. Keywords: ABO blood group, peptic ulcer disease, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, NSAIDs

Research topics

  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2147/jbm.s209416

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.