MARATTO

article · Journal of Science Research and Reviews

<b>Evaluation of Privacy-Utility Trade-off in an Adaptive Differential Privacy-Infused Secure Aggregation (ADPSA) Model for Federated Learning in IoT Environments</b>

Abstract

A key challenge in privacy-preserving Federated Learning (FL) is the trade-off between achieving strong privacy guarantees and maintaining high model utility. While Differential Privacy (DP) offers a formal solution, static implementations often result in excessive noise, harming accuracy. This paper presents the comprehensive evaluation of the proposed Adaptive Differential Privacy-Infused Secure Aggregation (ADPSA) model, focusing on its ability to balance privacy and utility in IoT environments. The evaluation was conducted using the N-BaIoT dataset across 100 clients for 100 communication rounds. The model was assessed against four key metrics: final privacy budget (ε), resistance to gradient inversion (measured via PSNR and SSIM), membership inference risk (attack accuracy), and final model accuracy. The ADPSA model achieved a strong final privacy budget (ε = 4.17), excellent resistance to gradient inversion (PSNR = 9.4 dB, SSIM = 0.12), and near-optimal protection against membership inference (attack accuracy = 50.9%). It maintained a high final accuracy of 90.6%, with a performance degradation of just 1.98% compared to the non-DP baseline. The results demonstrate that the adaptive privacy mechanism successfully optimizes the privacy-utility trade-off, providing strong protection with minimal impact on model performance. These characteristics make ADPSA particularly suitable for resource-constrained IoT deployments where both privacy sensitivity and computational efficiency are critical.

Research topics

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.70882/josrar.2026.v3i2.176

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.