article · Asian Journal of Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology
Background: Hyperprolactinemia is a significant endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age and is strongly associated with menstrual disturbances, anovulation, and infertility. Psychosocial and lifestyle factors have been suggested as potential contributors, yet evidence from sub-Saharan Africa remains limited. This study investigated the sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial correlates of hyperprolactinemia among women of reproductive age in Enugu, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 women aged 25–44 years. Sociodemographic and lifestyle information were obtained using a structured questionnaire, while psychosocial stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Serum prolactin levels were measured, and hyperprolactinemia was defined as ≥25 ng/mL. Associations between variables and prolactin status were assessed using chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationship between PSS scores and prolactin levels. Results: Of the 60 participants, 41.7% had elevated serum prolactin levels. Hyperprolactinemia showed no significant association with age, marital status, educational level, alcohol intake, or smoking (p > 0.05). However, significant associations were observed with occupational status and perceived stress. Unemployed women had a higher prevalence of hyperprolactinemia (63.4%) compared to employed women (28.9%; p = 0.014). Stress demonstrated a strong dose–response pattern, with the prevalence of elevated prolactin increasing from 13.3% in the low-stress group to 92.8% in the high-stress group (p < 0.0001). A moderate positive correlation was found between PSS scores and serum prolactin levels (r = 0.386, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Psychosocial stress and occupational status are significant correlates of hyperprolactinemia among women of reproductive age in Enugu. These findings underscore the need for stress reduction interventions and psychosocial assessment in infertility evaluation and management.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.9734/ajbgmb/2025/v17i12512
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.