MARATTO

article · The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology

Larvicidal, adulticidal and latent effects of five microbial insecticides against Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Abstract Background Housefly, Musca domestica L., causes a variety of health problems for humans and animals. Therefore, the management of houseflies is crucial to prevent health threat caused by diseases transmitted by this vector. Methods Insecticidal activity of five microbial insecticides against larvae and adults of M. domestica was assessed under laboratory conditions. To evaluate the toxicity against for third instar larvae, the microbial insecticides, abamectin (AB), emamectin benzoate (EB), ivermectin (IV), spinosad (SP) and spinetoram (SI), were mixed individually with food-media at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mg/kg, while in case of adults, the insecticides were tested at 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 ml/L in sugar water solution. Results The results showed that all tested microbial insecticides were highly toxic against larvae. The maximum larvicidal activity was achieved by EB with LC 50 value of 0.05 mg/kg, followed by AB, IV, SP and SI with LC 50 values of 2.02, 2.05, 2.09 and 8.06 mg/kg after 72 h of exposure, respectively. Likewise, treatments with EB (4.0 mg/kg) and AB (8.0 mg/kg) caused a complete suppression of adult emergence and a strong reduction of pupation (0.0 and 37.5%), respectively. Furthermore, the three microbial insecticides, AB (LC 50 = 0.04 and 0.03 ml/L), EB (LC 50 = 0.05 and 0.03 ml/L) and IV (LC 50 = 0.10 and 0.03 ml/L), showed a strong toxicity against M. domestica adults after 24 and 48 h of exposure, respectively. Conclusions Based on these findings, the investigated microbial insecticides, especially EB and AB, could be applied in IPM programs of M. domestica .

Research topics

  • Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s41936-025-00441-w

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.