article · PLOS Global Public Health
Since 2018, the WHO recommends provision of single-dose rifampicin post-exposure prophylaxis (SDR-PEP) to contacts of leprosy patients. In the Post-ExpOsure Prophylaxis for LEprosy (PEOPLE) trial that took place in the Comoros (Anjouan and Mohéli) and Madagascar (2019-2023), single double-dose rifampicin (SDDR)-PEP administration modalities were compared. Additionally, in 16/64 villages, anti-M. leprae phenolic glycolipid-I (anti-PGL-I) IgM levels were measured for three consecutive years, in newly diagnosed leprosy patients and more than 17,000 household- and neighbourhood contacts who had been screened for signs of leprosy. To study the impact of active case finding and SDDR-PEP on M. leprae infection rates in the population, fingerstick blood of contacts was sampled before, during and after the administration of SDDR-PEP. In this serosurvey, anti-PGL-I IgM levels were measured for the first time at such large scale by local staff using a field-friendly, quantitative lateral flow assay based on the UCP-platform (UCP-LFA). Out of 53 multibacillary patients with a bacterial index of 1 or higher, 92.5% (n = 49) tested seropositive for anti-M. leprae PGL-I IgM, confirming excellent performance of the test when executed by local staff. Before SDDR-PEP administration, seroprevalence among contacts in the different villages ranged from 21.9% to 27.4% across the three study sites. After two years of active case finding and SDDR-PEP, seroprevalence was significantly lower in the population in all three study sites (11.6% to 22.8%). Longitudinal serological monitoring in initially seropositive contacts showed significant reductions in anti-PGL-I IgM levels at an individual level. This reduction in seropositivity was observed irrespective of administration of SDDR-PEP. These serological data suggest that the implemented combination of active case finding with SDDR-PEP, led to a reduction in infection levels in the population in these study sites. This large-scale field serosurvey demonstrates the usefulness of the anti-PGL-I UCP-LFA to evaluate and monitor at a population level the effects of leprosy control interventions on M. leprae transmission.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005270
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.