MARATTO

article · Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry

Investigation of Quinoxaline-1,2,3-triazole Derivatives for Targeting SARS-CoV-2 via RBD Binding and PLpro Inhibition

Abstract

Objective: A library of ten derivatives of 3-benzyl-N1-substituted quinoxalin-2-ones was designed and investigated for targeting SARS-CoV-2. Methods: The target compounds were synthesized as N1-substituted quinoxalines and quinoxaline/triazole hybrids via a click reaction. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of these compounds was evaluated via spike protein and papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibition assays. Results and Discussion: The inhibition assays revealed a remarkable dual inhibitory activity for most compounds, ranging from 76.2 to 86.9%. Compounds (IIIb) and (IIIc) were identified as the most potent inhibitors based on enzyme kinetics studies. They exhibited a mixed inhibition type against both the PLpro enzyme and the spike protein. The most effective compound, (IIIc), demonstrated the lowest Ki competitive and Ki noncompetitive values for PLpro (0.23 ± 3 × 10–4 and 0.57 ± 1 × 10–3 µM) and spike protein (0.83 ± 1 × 10–4 and 1.03 ± 2 × 10–4 µM), respectively. These results indicate that compound (IIIb) acts as a competitive inhibitor (lower Ki value). Interestingly, molecular docking studies of both enzymes’ active sites revealed a significant binding affinity of our compounds, supporting the biological results. In silico prediction studies indicated that most of the candidates comply with Lipinski’s and Veber’s rules, demonstrating acceptable drug-likeness parameters and no predicted CNS side effects. Conclusions: The investigated compounds exhibited favorable inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 and strong binding interactions, suggesting their potential as therapeutic candidates against COVID-19.

Research topics

  • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
  • Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Synthesis and biological activity

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1134/s106816202460572x

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.