MARATTO

article · Telecommunications and Radio Engineering

INVESTIGATION OF INDOOR PATH LOSS PREDICTION MODELS FOR 5G WIRELESS NETWORKS AT 28 GHZ FOR DIFFERENT ANTENNA POLARIZATIONS

Abstract

Cellular data traffic is expected to increase fivefold by 2030. This rise in connectivity can be met by expanding connectivity, bandwidth availability, and huge, small cell expansion. Significant advancements in air-interface configuration have resulted in spectral effectiveness that is very similar to the channel capacity. This study, done in an interior corridor setting, provides line-of-sight (LOS) real measurement data scenarios that evaluate close in (CI) as well as floating intercept (FI) path loss prediction models for 28 GHz frequency ranges at various antenna polarizations. This work describes, investigates, and compares the effectiveness of two renowned path loss prediction approaches: the single frequency CI empty space reference distance approach and the single frequency FI model. The LOS comparison investigation at V-V and V-H antenna polarizations demonstrates that the CI and FI models provide reasonable and precise predictions that match the actual observed data for the two polarizations. For both polarizations, the slope of the path loss curve in the FI is almost identical to the path loss exponent (PLE) values, showing similar behavior in this environment. Finally, the LOS findings indicate that the CI and FI mode ls can be trusted as good path loss frameworks for hallway settings for V-V along with V-H polarizations. Both polarizations demonstrate stable actions over measured distances in the 28 GHz band, with CI being more stable and having more fits in both cases.

Research topics

  • Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1615/telecomradeng.2025053357

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.