MARATTO

article · Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects

Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses

20232 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

In this study, hybrid renewable power systems (HRPS) based on biomass-fired (BF) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies are investigated. Parabolic trough collector (PTC), linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) and solar tower (ST) as CSP technologies are considered. This study aims to determine and compare exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors, as well as and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of three proposed HRPS options for the district of Faro in the province of Garoua, Cameroon. Also, advanced exergy destruction expressions are used. We found the optimized exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors for the subsystems of HRPS to be between 0.04–0.98 and 0.05–0.98, respectively. They have the highest values for the drying system (DS), and the lowest values for the solar-biomass field (SF+BF). The relative cost and environmental impact differences for the subsystems of HRPS are in the ranges of 0.07–0.79 and 0.28–0.96, respectively. They have the highest values for the DS, and the lowest values for the power block (PB). According to the levelized exergoeconomic/exergoenvironmental performances, PTC – BF presents the worst results before the optimization. ST – BF shows the best exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performance in the optimization process. The results of the sensitivity and optimization analyses reveal that it is essential to conduct eco-indicator and advanced exergy analyses to avoid high environmental impact points and specific exergy destructions.

Research topics

  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
  • Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2239747

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.