MARATTO

article · Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects

Investigation into the effects of SiO<sub>2</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> nanolayer on the thermal performance of solar box type cooker

In plain language

An experimental study investigated the thermal performance of a stepped solar box type cooker (SSBC) by applying energetic silicon dioxide (SiO2) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were coated onto the cooker's bar plate at various ratios, ranging from 5% to 25%, to enhance solar ray absorption. The research found that an optimised ratio of 15% SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles significantly increased the average absorption bar plate temperature. This improvement led to an overall thermal efficiency increase of 31.42% for the system. The coated SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated improved performance compared to cookers using single nanoparticles (SiO2, TiO2) or conventional designs, with specific performance increases observed across all tested ratios.

Key takeaways

  • A stepped solar box type cooker (SSBC) was experimentally analysed using SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles.
  • Nanolayers of SiO2/TiO2 were applied to the bar plate to enhance solar ray absorption and thermal performance.
  • An optimised ratio of 15% SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles increased the average absorption bar plate temperature.
  • The system achieved an overall thermal efficiency improvement of 31.42% with the optimised nanoparticle coating.
  • Coated SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles showed better performance compared to single nanoparticles and conventional cookers.

Why it matters

Improving the efficiency of solar cookers can provide a sustainable and cost-effective cooking solution, particularly in regions with abundant sunlight. Enhanced thermal performance means faster cooking times and more effective use of solar energy, reducing reliance on traditional fuels and their associated environmental and health impacts.

Commercialisation angle

This research presents an early-stage development for improving the thermal efficiency of solar box type cookers. The findings could lead to the development of more efficient solar cooking appliances for domestic or community use, potentially benefiting households and organisations seeking sustainable cooking solutions. Further applied research and development would be needed to transition this experimental finding into a market-ready product.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The current study presents an experimental analysis of a stepped solar box type cooker (SSBC) using energetic SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles focused on the different ratios of 5% to 25% with coating on the bar plate to enhance thermal performance. The important parameters of the system have been enhanced due to better absorption of solar rays. It depends on bar plate performances because it increases the temperature and reduces the cooking time. The experimental study was depicted the solar box cooker’s system, which uses a modified system with improved temperature. The inner moist air temperature generated through the bar plate is associated with the absorption frequency, which increased the furious SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles’ temperature. Optimized energetic SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles increased by the average absorption bar plate temperature, which is focused on the ratio of 15% and improved overall thermal efficiency of 31.42% of the system. Compared to other doping nanoparticles used for solar thermal applications to show the increases in the performances. The coated SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles of SSBC have been increased of 31.77%, 37.69%, 49.21%, 36.99% and 34.66% for 5%,10%,15%,20%,25% individually and compared to that of single nanoparticles (SiO2, TiO2), convention cooker.

Research topics

  • Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
  • Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
  • Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1859018

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.