MARATTO

article · Engineering Research Journal

INVESTIGATING TIG ARC WELDMENTS FOR AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL 304 AND 304L: A MECHANICAL AND METALLURGICAL ANALYSIS

2024Open accessBenha University

Abstract

In this study, the mechanical properties and microstructural characteristics of welded joints made from stainless steels 304 and 304L were investigated with respect to the applied TIG welding parameters, including the filler type and applied current. Two different filler electrodes (ER304 and ER309) were used, and two distinct currents (70 and 80 A) were applied during the welding process. The dissimilar metals being joined had a thickness of 2 mm. The welded joints were evaluated using X-Ray radiography examination, tensile strength testing, microhardness testing, and microstructure investigation under all proposed welding conditions. The examination results revealed that all welding passes were continuous and free of internal defects, except for the samples welded with ER309 at 70 A. The sample welded with ER304 at 80 A demonstrated the highest average maximum tensile strength (UTS) of 692 MPa, while the sample welded with ER309 at 70 A had the lowest average UTS of 670 MPa. It was observed that welding with 80 A resulted in higher mechanical properties than welding with 70 A. The microhardness of the base metal (BM), heat-affected zone (HAZ), and weld zone (WZ) was measured for all welding conditions. A dendritic structure was formed at the WZ of the welded joints, with ferrite and austenite homogeneously distributed throughout. Consequently, based on the excellent properties obtained, ER304 at 80 A is recommended for high-tech industrial applications.

Research topics

  • Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
  • Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/erjsh.2023.228930.1205

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.