MARATTO

article · Journal of Software Evolution and Process

Investigating the Effectiveness of COSMIC Method for Sizing Chatbots' Requirements: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the modern digital era, chatbots have emerged as vital AI‐powered systems owing to their usefulness and time savings, increasing companies' interest in developing or integrating these AI systems. Proper evaluation of chatbots requirements plays a critical role in managing their development projects and improving their quality and adoption. Although chatbots can be evaluated using the COSMIC FSM method, previous studies have mainly focused on intuitively evaluating the quality requirements of chatbots, often overlooking standardized assessments. In this paper, we report the results of applying COSMIC—ISO 19761 to chatbot requirements through the BotCFP tool. We selected 41 chatbots from web and mobile stores. The selected chatbots were ranked according to their relative COSMIC sizes and the scores obtained from a quality assessment questionnaire. We compared functional size rankings with functionality score rankings, then examined the relationship between chatbots' functional sizes and average users' ratings, alongside the correlation between mobile chatbot downloads and web chatbot visits. The results showed that 68.7% of the chatbots have similar ranking in both functional size and functionality score. Furthermore, there was no correlation between the functional size of the chatbots and their average users' ratings, mobile downloads, and web visits. The analysis of the results shows the effectiveness of the COSMIC FSM in assessing the chatbot requirements of the application layer. Our investigation highlights the need to extend COSMIC to support in‐depth evaluation of chatbots and AI‐based systems at the AI layer in future work.

Research topics

  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
  • Persona Design and Applications

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/smr.70110

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.