MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Oncology

Interval-compressed chemotherapy in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma: report on feasibility and toxicity from a North African center

Abstract

Background: Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is the second most common malignant bone tumor in patients under 20 years of age. The "Euro-Ewing 2012" trial established induction therapy with the 2-week-interval VDC/IE (Vincristine-Doxorubicine-Cyclophosphamide/Ifosfamide-Etoposide) as the standard of care. However, real-world data remain limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility, tolerance, and effectiveness of this protocol. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-institutional cohort study, including patients with ES treated between January 2018 and April 2024 using the interval-compressed VDC/IE protocol. Data were collected on feasibility, toxicity, and outcomes. Results: We included 27 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 18.3 years. Sekeletal tumors predominated (89%), mainly in the pelvis and lower limbs. Metastatic disease was present at diagnosis in 41%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was initiated after a median delay of 36 days post-biopsy, with a median duration of 22 weeks and a mean interval of 19.8 days. The mean relative dose intensity (RDI) was 70%, with only 11% of patients achieving an RDI >85%. A lower RDI was observed in adults (p=0.011) and metastatic stage patients (p=0.011). High-grade toxicities were reported in 89% of patients, primarily neutropenia. Good pathologic response was reported in 11 patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the median OS was 32 months, with 3-year OS and EFS rates of 36.9% and 19.9%, respectively. The relapse rate was 67%, with a median relapse time of 13 months. Conclusion: This study highlights the challenges of implementing the EE2012 protocol in our practice. Adapting the regimen could optimize induction, particularly for localized forms.

Research topics

  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Management of metastatic bone disease

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1710836

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.