article · The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Background: Hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) anastomosis is a vital surgical procedure in gastrointestinal surgery that involvesthe creation of a connection between the bile duct and the jejunum. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness ofinterrupted suturing, compared with continuous suturing of the posterior wall of the anastomosis, regarding primary andsecondary outcomes of HJ anastomosis.Patients and Methods: Sixty patients were allocated to two groups, each group comprising 30 patients where in group A(Interrupted Suture, n=30), 4/0 polydioxanone sutures were used. In group B (continuous Suture, n=30), 4/0 proline sutureswere used. In addition, in all cases interrupted sutures 4/0 polydioxanone were used in the anterior wall of anastomosis todecrease postoperative stricture incidence, then all patients were followed up until the end of data analysis (6 months afterHJ anastomosis) using a standardized data collection sheet.Results: The primary postoperative outcomes: Regarding the incidence of leakage, the continuous group (13.3%) hada lower rate of postoperative biliary leak than the interrupted group (16.7%). Regarding the incidence of stricture ofanastomosis, two (6.7%) cases had strictures in the interrupted group, whereas there were four (13.8%) strictures in thecontinuous group. This suggests that the interrupted group had a lower risk of postoperative strictures than the continuousgroup. Regarding secondary outcomes, the mean number of sutures of the posterior wall was six in the interrupted group,while it was two in the continuous group which means the continuous group was better than the interrupted group asregards cost and time consumed during anastomosis.Conclusion: Postoperative outcomes in HJ vary with interrupted and continuous suture techniques. The continuoussutures revealed lower postoperative biliary leakage, and had better time and cost-effectiveness, while the interruptedsutures had lower incidence of stricture formation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/ejsur.2024.357121
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.