MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Interpretable and extrapolation-stable model for predicting nanofluid thermal conductivity

2026Open accessAl-Azhar University

Abstract

Accurate prediction of nanofluid thermal conductivity is essential for the design of advanced thermal systems; however, existing approaches often face a trade-off between predictive accuracy and physical interpretability. In this study, a physics-guided hybrid modeling framework is proposed by integrating a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) with a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) to address this limitation. The proposed methodology combines a spline-based GAM to capture global thermophysical trends with a regularized boosting model to learn localized nonlinear corrections. A comprehensive preprocessing pipeline is implemented, including feature engineering, Box-Cox transformation for variance stabilization, and a Random Forest-based outlier detection strategy. The hybrid model is evaluated against several state-of-the-art machine learning methods, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Gaussian Processes, Neural Networks, and Decision Trees. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves high predictive accuracy (RMSE [Formula: see text] W/mK) while maintaining physically consistent behavior across the studied domain. The model's generalization capability is further validated using a Leave-One-Group-Out (LOGO) protocol, where it exhibits stable performance when predicting unseen base fluids. Additionally, the hybrid approach produces smooth and interpretable response profiles that align with known thermodynamic trends. These findings indicate that physics-guided hybrid modeling provides a balanced and reliable approach for thermophysical property prediction, offering improved interpretability without compromising predictive performance.

Research topics

  • Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-52822-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.