MARATTO

article · Cell Metabolism

International consensus on fasting terminology

202487 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Tunis El Manar

In plain language

Fasting is increasingly used to prevent and treat disease, yet standard terminology across the field has been lacking. To address this, an international panel of thirty-eight clinicians and researchers took part in a Delphi consensus process involving five online surveys and a live digital conference. Twenty-five experts completed the full process. The panel established agreed definitions for core concepts, defining general fasting as the voluntary abstinence from some or all food or beverages. Specific categories were clarified, including modified fasting as limiting energy intake to at most a quarter of requirements, short-term fasting lasting two to three days, and prolonged fasting extending to four or more consecutive days. Intermittent fasting was classified as repetitive fasting episodes lasting forty-eight hours or fewer. These standardised definitions aim to clarify scientific communication and clinical practice in metabolic and dietary interventions.

Key takeaways

  • An international Delphi consensus process with thirty-eight multidisciplinary experts established standardised definitions for human fasting interventions.
  • Fasting is defined as voluntary abstinence from some or all food, or food and beverages, while modified fasting restricts energy intake to a maximum of twenty-five per cent of energy needs.
  • Fasting durations were categorised into short-term fasting lasting two to three days, prolonged fasting of four or more consecutive days, and intermittent fasting involving repetitive cycles of up to forty-eight hours.
  • Time-restricted eating, intermittent fasting, and fasting-mimicking diets generated the greatest amount of discussion during the consensus process.

Why it matters

Clear definitions are essential for comparing dietary trials and prescribing clinical interventions safely. Without consistent language, patients, healthcare providers, and researchers often misunderstand or conflate very different dietary regimens. Standardising terms such as intermittent, modified, and prolonged fasting ensures that research outcomes can be reliably compared, helping to advance evidence-based nutritional strategies for health promotion and disease management.

Commercialisation angle

These standardised definitions provide a foundational reference for clinical practitioners, digital health developers, and clinical trial designers creating dietary protocols or wellness platforms. The guidance is ready for immediate adoption in clinical trial design and product categorisation, although the abstract does not indicate any proprietary technology or direct commercial product development arising from the study.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Although fasting is increasingly applied for disease prevention and treatment, consensus on terminology is lacking. Using Delphi methodology, an international, multidisciplinary panel of researchers and clinicians standardized definitions of various fasting approaches in humans. Five online surveys and a live online conference were conducted with 38 experts, 25 of whom completed all 5 surveys. Consensus was achieved for the following terms: "fasting" (voluntary abstinence from some or all foods or foods and beverages), "modified fasting" (restriction of energy intake to max. 25% of energy needs), "fluid-only fasting," "alternate-day fasting," "short-term fasting" (lasting 2-3 days), "prolonged fasting" (≥4 consecutive days), and "religious fasting." "Intermittent fasting" (repetitive fasting periods lasting ≤48 h), "time-restricted eating," and "fasting-mimicking diet" were discussed most. This study provides expert recommendations on fasting terminology for future research and clinical applications, facilitating communication and cross-referencing in the field.

Research topics

  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.06.013

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.