MARATTO

article · PSU Research Review

Interconnections between governance shortcomings and resource curse in a resource-dependent economy

202225 citationsOpen access

In plain language

Overreliance on natural resource wealth can worsen dysfunctional economic outcomes in Nigeria when institutional frameworks remain weak. An econometric investigation spanning 1996 to 2019 assessed the relationship between natural resource rents, institutional quality, and economic growth using cointegration and causality techniques. The results establish that the combination of natural resource rents and poor governance exerts a negligible or even retarding impact on economic growth over both the short and long run. Furthermore, a unidirectional causal link runs from this combined interaction to national growth, demonstrating that economic trajectory is jointly influenced by resource revenues alongside institutional standards. Consequently, economic outcomes in resource-rich nations reflect governance mechanisms and ownership structures rather than resource windfalls alone, highlighting the critical role institutional quality plays in mediating development.

Key takeaways

  • Overreliance on natural resources can intensify negative economic outcomes in Nigeria.
  • A combination of weak governance and natural resource rents has a negligible or retarding effect on short-run and long-run economic growth.
  • A unidirectional causal relationship runs from the interaction of resource rents and governance quality directly to economic growth.
  • Economic performance in resource-abundant countries is shaped by governance quality and institutional frameworks rather than resource windfalls alone.

Why it matters

Understanding the dynamics between natural wealth and national performance is crucial for resource-dependent nations. Rather than viewing resource revenues as an automatic engine for prosperity, the evidence demonstrates that weak governance can stall economic progress. Strengthening institutions is therefore essential to prevent resource wealth from turning into an economic hindrance, guiding effective policy design and public administration.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Purpose The paper assesses the role of natural resource rents in Nigeria's economy through the channel of institutional quality. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is done with the use of autoregressive-distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach to cointegration, vector error correction model (VECM), Granger causality test and cointegrating regression over the period 1996–2019. Findings Findings support the notion that overreliance on natural resources could exacerbate the growing number of dysfunctional economic outcomes in the country. The study confirms that a mix of weak governance quality and natural resource rents could have a negligible effect on economic growth and possible retardation impact on the economy in the long run as well as in the short run. The evidence further reveals that there is unidirectional causality running from the interaction term to growth, suggesting that growth trajectory could be jointly determined by natural resource rents and the quality of institutions. Originality/value The divergent arguments associated with the mechanisms of resource curse in each of the resource-rich countries offer ample support for the contention that economic outcomes in resource-abundant states may not be a product of resource windfalls per se , but rather the quality of governance or ownership structure. Hence, the ultimate aim of the analysis is to further understanding on the link between resource rents and growth in Nigeria via governance channel.

Research topics

  • Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Mining and Resource Management
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1108/prr-09-2021-0052

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.