MARATTO

article · BioTechnologia

Integration of proteomics and bioinformatics in traumatic brain injury biomarker discovery

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant medical crisis with no FDA-approved therapies to improve functional outcomes. Key biomarkers, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 calcium-binding protein B (S-100B), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), are crucial for understanding TBI pathology. Materials and methods: This study integrates proteomic and bioinformatic approaches to explore established TBI biomarkers' structural and functional complexities: GFAP, S-100B, and UCH-L1. Results: Our comprehensive secondary structure and solvent accessibility assessment, conducted with PredictProtein, confirmed the predominance of alpha-helices in GFAP and S-100B, while UCH-L1 displayed a balanced mix of helices (65.00, 67.39, and 40.81%), beta strands (6.20, 0, and 17.94%), and coils (40.81, 17.94, and 41.26%). AlphaFold and I-TASSER were identified as the best servers for full-length tertiary structure prediction for the three target proteins, based on root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), TM-score, and C-score assessments. Protein motif database scans predicted four, eight, and one protein-binding motifs and two, three, and one post-translational modifications for GFAP, S-100B, and UCH-L1, respectively. Conclusions: GFAP's role in axonal transport and synaptic plasticity was emphasized through motifs such as Filament and DUF1664. S-100B's association with neuroinflammation and oxidative stress post-TBI was supported by the S-100/ICaBP-type calcium-binding domain. UCH-L1's dualistic impact on TBI was further clarified by the Peptidase_C12 motif. This approach deepens our comprehension of these biomarkers and paves the way for targeted diagnostics in TBI.

Research topics

  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Clusterin in disease pathology

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5114/bta/202470

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.