article · Annales Africaines de Medecine
Context and objective. Artificial Intelligence (AI) applied to computed tomography (CT) image analysis is progressively emerging as a promising tool to enhance the detection of neuroradiological emergencies. The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of AI in detecting intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) on CT scans. Methods. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported at least one diagnostic performance indicator (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by manual screening (articles published between 2015–2025). Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Metrics were analyzed using R Studio and MetaBaye DTA. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO to ensure methodological transparency. Results. Seventeen mainly retrospective studies were included, mostly involving at least two reference radiologists. The pooled sensitivity was 0.945 (95% CI: 0.889–0.974) and specificity 0.937 (95% CI: 0.871–0.971). The positive (PLR = 16.6) and negative (NLR = 0.07) likelihood ratios demonstrated the strong ability of AI to confirm or exclude ICH. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) reached 280, with substantial heterogeneity across all measures (I² > 95%). Conclusion. Convolutional neural network–based models show high diagnostic accuracy for ICH detection, supporting their potential to enhance neuroradiological diagnosis. However, their implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), requires a systemic approach integrating infrastructure development, ethical governance, algorithmic epublic of contextualization, and inter-institutional partnerships. Received: May 30th, 2025 Accepted: October 13th, 2025 https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/aamed.v19i1.17
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4314/aamed.v19i1.17
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.